Відео

Nevermind you win I lose you have won 🏆 I'll ask some other Christians to ask

I don't know what that means.

Between 2008 and right now?

Yes, I know. It's because of the approach that I take : taking the words on the pages of the Bible to mean what they actually say. I've been being called out on that for decades but I persist.

@@NonStampCollector meanings of words today are not the same as back then, when the Bible talks about hating your father it means in the sense of not prioritizing your father rather than what the word “hate” has come to mean today. And some of your alleged contradictions may have the Bible saying the same “word” even though it’s clearly in two different senses of the word But yeah this video was over a decade ago

@@NonStampCollector also what is the meaning of your channel name, I am curious.

​@@RustyCogthe phrase "non-stamp collector" is a response to people who say being an atheist is a religion. "If not believing in a god is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a collection."

How do you know that it was Jesus and not some other 2,000 year-old Jewish zombie?

@@NonStampCollector no, it was my Mexican friend

So the KJV is wrong. How is this a strike against me?

@@NonStampCollector You're saying these are contradictions in the bible not translation lol

There's a contradiction in the most popular and widely-read translation of the Bible that has ever existed. "Oh, but it's only a translation" doesn't cut it. If I wrote an autobiography and the publisher allowed the most widely-read version to contain errors, I'd be pissed. The fact that the author of pi apparently let this shit fly is not very good proof that he had any part in any of it. And by the way: it's not as if we have the originals to compare to. What we have are translations of copies which may or may not have been complete or accurate.

Whats the point of an all-knowing god who knows absolutely everything from beginning to end, needing to test someone when that god can literally read their minds and see their futures. 😅

If only I'd put the references on the screen.

?

Well it's more a case of changing his viewpoints. I chose those two arenas because they're known for dogged adherence. How many gym bros become vegetarian? How many anti-Apple people make the switch?

Helped me greatly

Like it matters.

That's a more convincing argument for monotheism than anything that William Lane Craig has ever come up with.

No thanks.

@@NonStampCollector why not? Because you just hate christianity?

Because as difficult as it is to understand, I'm mostly interested in the religion that I was raised into, which I devoted one day per week to throughout my childhood, which I got into for myself as a teenager, believed in firmly, devoted one day a week to throughout my teenage years, prosthelytized, brought others to, and then struggled with for several very dark years, and now which has an incredibly heavy influence over the culture and politics of my home country and the planet generally..... Rather than some religion I know fuck all about and which has had zip fuckety squat impact on any area of my life ever. So again, no thanks.

Nah I think you're wrong about that. Isn't there that famous part where he specifically calls upon all slave-owners to set their slaves free immediately, and absolutely denounces such inhumane behavior? I'll just check my new testament...... Oh shit.

Well, make it right. Set us straight. How SHOULD homosexuals be dealt with; exile or death?

@@NonStampCollector Neither. They should be shown love and led to Christ and taught about his sacrifice.

So both authors were wrong? Cool.

@@NonStampCollector Where do you get the idea that you should kill people for being homosexual? If you have a specific passage in mind maybe I could explain it 😁

@@hmmmmmmnnmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Leviticus 20:13? Let me guess, you are going to cherry pick shit out of the OT and say tHaT doEsNt cOuNt. Except when it suits you, then it applies. Maybe tell the millions of other christians around the world that - they sure take it literally.

Trust me: using MS Paint, with the scores changing on every frame... It took a lot longer than most Christians have EVER spent in the old testament.

It’s believers who take these entire documents out of context: the historical context in which they were written, during which errors, mistakes, miscopies, mistranslations, and deliberate changes were absolutely normal, natural, and expected. Copyists made mistakes and changes. They added things, omitted things, and fixed things that they thought the previous copyists had gotten wrong. They copied up incomplete copies, mistranslated copies, and unclear copies made on poor writing materials. There is nothing to justify a belief that these particular documents were each uniquely immune from the problems that effected all written texts up until the invention of the printing press. Similarly, there is nothing to justify a belief that not only that they were uniquely free of errors at every stage of the transmission process over centuries, passing through countless hands along the way, but that they actually come to us representing exactly every word that the original authors penned! Were the copyists thorough? Were the translations between the Greek, Latin, and Aramaic accurate? Were they complete? Would they have been disputed by other translators who might have been more skillful? Believing such a ludicrous and unsupported claim as that the bible texts come to us free of changes, errors, omissions, additions, agendas, etc, is to take the entire documents themselves completely out of context.

It’s believers who take these entire documents out of context: the historical context in which they were written, during which errors, mistakes, miscopies, mistranslations, and deliberate changes were absolutely normal, natural, and expected. Copyists made mistakes and changes. They added things, omitted things, and fixed things that they thought the previous copyists had gotten wrong. They copied up incomplete copies, mistranslated copies, and unclear copies made on poor writing materials. There is nothing to justify a belief that these particular documents were each uniquely immune from the problems that effected all written texts up until the invention of the printing press. Similarly, there is nothing to justify a belief that not only that they were uniquely free of errors at every stage of the transmission process over centuries, passing through countless hands along the way, but that they actually come to us representing exactly every word that the original authors penned! Were the copyists thorough? Were the translations between the Greek, Latin, and Aramaic accurate? Were they complete? Would they have been disputed by other translators who might have been more skillful? Believing such a ludicrous and unsupported claim as that the bible texts come to us free of changes, errors, omissions, additions, agendas, etc, is to take the entire documents themselves completely out of context.

It’s believers who take these entire documents out of context: the historical context in which they were written, during which errors, mistakes, miscopies, mistranslations, and deliberate changes were absolutely normal, natural, and expected. Copyists made mistakes and changes. They added things, omitted things, and fixed things that they thought the previous copyists had gotten wrong. They copied up incomplete copies, mistranslated copies, and unclear copies made on poor writing materials. There is nothing to justify a belief that these particular documents were each uniquely immune from the problems that effected all written texts up until the invention of the printing press. Similarly, there is nothing to justify a belief that not only that they were uniquely free of errors at every stage of the transmission process over centuries, passing through countless hands along the way, but that they actually come to us representing exactly every word that the original authors penned! Were the copyists thorough? Were the translations between the Greek, Latin, and Aramaic accurate? Were they complete? Would they have been disputed by other translators who might have been more skillful? Believing such a ludicrous and unsupported claim as that the bible texts come to us free of changes, errors, omissions, additions, agendas, etc, is to take the entire documents themselves completely out of context.

It’s believers who take these entire documents out of context: the historical context in which they were written, during which errors, mistakes, miscopies, mistranslations, and deliberate changes were absolutely normal, natural, and expected. Copyists made mistakes and changes. They added things, omitted things, and fixed things that they thought the previous copyists had gotten wrong. They copied up incomplete copies, mistranslated copies, and unclear copies made on poor writing materials. There is nothing to justify a belief that these particular documents were each uniquely immune from the problems that effected all written texts up until the invention of the printing press. Similarly, there is nothing to justify a belief that not only that they were uniquely free of errors at every stage of the transmission process over centuries, passing through countless hands along the way, but that they actually come to us representing exactly every word that the original authors penned! Were the copyists thorough? Were the translations between the Greek, Latin, and Aramaic accurate? Were they complete? Would they have been disputed by other translators who might have been more skillful? Believing such a ludicrous and unsupported claim as that the bible texts come to us free of changes, errors, omissions, additions, agendas, etc, is to take the entire documents themselves completely out of context.

If I may say so myself, even as early as 2008 I could see that some of the UA-cam videos that people were making were going to stand through time, and others were going to be dated and irrelevant very quickly. I decided that I'd try to make things with a longer shelf life. To this day I sometimes thank the gods for having given me that insight in my earliest weeks of making videos.

Bad things happen because they're are bad people out there... who are following the instructions given by God himself in the Bible. "Your slaves are to come from the nations around you. From them you may buy slaves." Perhaps it would have been helpful for a divine commandment to have said "You shall not have slaves, because all people are free and can not be kept as property." Instead we get "They shall become your property... You can make them slaves for life..." Two pieces of advice : read your Bible, and actually watch the video before you comment on it that it's wrong.

For a non Christian you make a standard Christian statement, one normally from the creation type at that. The bible does endorse slavery with gods blessing and rules. The slave bible removed bits that said all are equal or anything that gave hope of freedom, even exedus was altered.

bc slavery is condemned in the bible

@@jin4712 No it's not! It's endorsed with rules! Why lie?

How many other things that are condemned in the Bible are done so with expressions such as "you may"?

Oooh, do tell! Foreskin secrets!

@@NonStampCollector God is stored in the foreskin. 14:10 Corinthians states "So it is decreed, so it shall be done, for the foreskin stores the very essence of God, and in its removal do we find true enlightenment and divine communion." I hope you find jeuse. I fucking hater atheist, but you seem to be a good.

@@NonStampCollector Youtub remove my comment. 1 14:10 corinthians states "So it is decreed, so it shall be done, for the foreskin stores the very essence of God, and in its removal do we find true enlightenment and divine communion.". Foreskin is a god storege. I cannot belief you athests operate this way. Find the god.

So why would for not quickly invent poker so that he could play it for foreskins?

@@NonStampCollector He is already god, and would possess the foreskin know. You are a philipine. Lack of pareciation for bible and whatnot.